Pengaruh Ambiguitas Peran Dan Konflik Peran Terhadap Fenomena Quiet Quitting: Perspektif Komunikasi Organisasi Pada Karyawan Generasi Z Di DKI Jakarta

Authors

  • Nadhifa Salsabila Universitas Bakrie
  • Ni Luh Ketut Indah Widia Sari Universitas Bakrie
  • Kenzo Samudra Universitas Bakrie

Keywords:

Ambiguitas peran, konflik peran, fenomena quiet quitting, Generasi Z, komunikasi organisasi

Abstract

Seiring dengan semakin maraknya jumlah Generasi Z di tempat kerja, bermunculan fenomena-fenomena baru yang menjadi trend viral di media sosial. Salah satu istilah dari fenomena yang sempat menarik perhatian khalayak adalah quiet quitting. Sederhananya, quiet quitting merujuk pada minimnya usaha yang dilakukan karyawan terhadap pekerjaan mereka. Jika ditilik dari kacamata perusahaan, fenomena quiet quitting yang dialami Generasi Z tentu membutuhkan intervensi komunikasi internal. Fenomena ini disorot sebagai krisis budaya kerja yang terindikasi dari kegagalan proses komunikasi organisasi. Penting untuk menilik lebih lanjut pengaruh antara kegagalan komunikasi peran terhadap fenomena quiet quitting. Penelitian ini lantas dilakukan untuk menguji pengaruh positif ambiguitas peran dan konflik peran terhadap fenomena quiet quitting pada karyawan Generasi Z. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif dengan kuesioner daring sebagai instrumen penelitian, dibagikan kepada 120 responden. Data diolah menggunakan aplikasi SmartPLS untuk menguji hubungan sebab akibat antar variabel dan dianalisis dengan teknik Partial Least Squares - Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ambiguitas peran dan konflik peran memiliki pengaruh langsung yang positif signifikan terhadap fenomena quiet quitting pada karyawan Generasi Z di Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Terjadinya ambiguitas dan konflik peran bukan semata-mata persoalan manajerial, tapi juga merupakan cerminan dari lemahnya koordinasi komunikasi internal suatu organisasi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Jumlah penduduk menurut wilayah, klasifikasi generasi, dan jenis kelamin, Indonesia, 2020. BPS.

Boles, J., Wood, J., & Johnson, J. (2003). Interrelationships of role conflict, role ambiguity, and work–family conflict with different facets of job satisfaction and the moderating effects of gender. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 23(2), 99–113.

Deloitte. (2025). The Deloitte Global 2025 Gen Z and Millennial Survey: Thriving at work, navigating uncertainty, and redefining success. Deloitte Global. https://www2.deloitte.com

Downs, C. W., & Hazen, M. D. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 14(3), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194367701400306

Ghimire, J., & Khanal, S. (2022). Role ambiguity and employee performance: Mediating role of job stress.

Greenbaum, H. H., Clampitt, P. G., & Willihnganz, S. (1988). Organizational communication: An examination of four instruments. Management Communication Quarterly, 2(2), 245–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318988002002004

Hair, J. F. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hamouche, S., Koritos, C., & Papastathopoulos, A. (2023). Quiet quitting: Relationship with other concepts and implications for tourism and hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(12), 4297–4312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2023-0145

Journal of Organizational Behavior Research, 7(2), 52–68.

Kalla, H. K. (2005). Integrated internal communications: A multidisciplinary perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510630106

Karim, M., Chowdhury, M., & Islam, M. (2021). Examining the impact of role ambiguity and role conflict on employee behavior. Journal of Management Research, 13(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v13i1.17923

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Khanal, J., & Ghimire, S. (2024). Understanding role conflict and role ambiguity of school principals in Nepal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221131991

Kim, J., & Rhee, Y. (2022). Strategic internal communication and organizational culture: The mediating role of employee engagement. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(3), 472–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221084008

Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2023). The emergence of quiet quitting: The role of job stressors, burnout, and meaningful work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 141, 103826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103826

Kinicki, A. (2021). Organizational behavior. McGraw-Hill.

Lastress, B. L., Karatepe, O. M., & Okumus, F. (2024). Combating quiet quitting: Implications for future research and practices for talent management. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2023-0611

Lee, S., & Li, J. (2022). Understanding quiet quitting: The role of workplace expectations and employee well-being. Employee Relations, 44(7), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2022-0064

Men, L. R., & Bowen, S. A. (2017). Excellence in internal communication management. Business Expert Press.

Morgan, K. (2023, August 15). ‘Quiet quitting is the status quo’: Workers are still proud to do the bare minimum. BBC

Public Relations Review, 48(1), 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102143

Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486

Ruck, K., Welch, M., & Men, L. R. (2022). Employee voice: An antecedent to organizational engagement?

Testa, M. R., & Sipe, L. (2023). Generational differences in work engagement and withdrawal behaviors: Implications for hospitality organizations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(2), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2022-0597

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.

Worklife. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20230811-quiet-quitting-is-the-status-quo-workers- are-still-proud-to-do-the-bare-minimum.

Wu, A., & Wei, W. (2024). Rationalizing quiet quitting? Deciphering the internal mechanism of front-line hospitality employees’ workplace deviance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 114, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103698

Yue, C. A., Zhou, A., Page, T. G., Morehouse, J., Capizzo, L. W., & Toth, E. L. (2025). Internal communication failure and organizational culture crisis: Evidence from post-pandemic organizations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 37(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2024.2309158

Zein, H. H. M., & Septiani, S. (2024). Digitalisasi Pemerintahan Daerah: Katalis Untuk Integrasi dan Optimasi Good Governance. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

How to Cite

Salsabila, N., Ni Luh Ketut Indah Widia Sari, & Kenzo Samudra. (2026). Pengaruh Ambiguitas Peran Dan Konflik Peran Terhadap Fenomena Quiet Quitting: Perspektif Komunikasi Organisasi Pada Karyawan Generasi Z Di DKI Jakarta. COMMTEMPORER: Jurnal Komunikasi Kontemporer, 2(2), 30–48. Retrieved from https://ojs.bakrie.ac.id/index.php/CJIK/article/view/601